Federal Law Overview
A grounding article on the federal baseline, why Schedule I status still matters, and why local reform headlines should not be mistaken for nationwide legality.
Article index
Blog
The blog is the long-form index for the site's editorial coverage. Articles are grouped by topic so readers can move from overview pages into more detailed writing without losing context.
The categories below reflect the project's core focus areas: law and policy, retreat evaluation, research, and safety screening. Summaries are written to help you decide where to begin, especially if you are comparing multiple themes at once.
Every article links back into the site's hub pages so the archive works as a connected editorial library rather than as a loose set of posts.
Browse all articles
Use these grouped summaries to move quickly between related pieces. The law and policy section explains the U.S. legal patchwork; the retreat section focuses on credibility and participant screening; the research section separates evidence from hype; and the safety section explains why contraindications and screening matter.
Law & policy
Understanding the State-by-State Legal Landscape
Why the U.S. landscape cannot be reduced to a simple map, and how to think about prohibition, decriminalization, and supervised state systems.
Decriminalization vs Medical Access
A plain-English guide to one of the biggest legal misunderstandings: decriminalization is not the same thing as medical access.
How Laws Vary by Jurisdiction
Why the relevant rule may change across federal land, cities, workplaces, housing, travel, and institutional settings.
Retreat evaluation
How to Evaluate a Psychedelic Retreat
A screening-oriented framework for separating thoughtful retreat operations from vague, evasive, or overly promotional ones.
Questions to Ask Before Booking a Retreat
A plain-English question list focused on legal clarity, staff roles, participant screening, emergency planning, and aftercare.
Integration: What It Means After a Retreat
An editorial overview of integration as follow-up, reflection, and support rather than branding shorthand.
Research
What Clinical Research Is Actually Studying
A reality check on the current evidence base: what studies are testing, how protocols work, and why headlines can outrun the data.
A Brief History of Psilocybin Research
A short history of how ceremonial traditions, laboratory science, prohibition, and renewed academic interest all shaped the current conversation.
Safety & screening
Risks, Contraindications, and Screening
Why screening exists, what contraindications can mean, and why information quality matters when risks are discussed.
Suggested reading paths
If you are starting from zero, begin with the law and policy articles and then move to the research overview. That sequence gives you the cleanest foundation for interpreting the rest of the site.
If you are evaluating a retreat or a facilitator-style program, begin with the retreat evaluation pieces and then read the screening article in the safety category. Those pages are designed to work together.
If you keep seeing dramatic research headlines, pair the clinical research article with the history article. The two together make it easier to see how media narratives can get ahead of scientific process.
Legality hub
Overview page for law and policy context.
Retreats hub
Overview page for retreat literacy and screening questions.
Research hub
Overview page for evidence, uncertainty, and cautious interpretation.
Safety hub
Overview page for contraindications and information quality.
Why the archive is grouped this way
Grouping the archive by topic does more than improve navigation. It also helps readers avoid one of the most common mistakes in this area: reading a legal story as if it answered a research question, or reading a research headline as if it settled a retreat-screening question. The categories make those boundaries visible.
The law and policy section focuses on categories of reform, jurisdiction, and terminology. The retreat section focuses on providers, screening, transparency, and aftercare. The research section focuses on evidence, uncertainty, and study design. The safety section focuses on fit, contraindications, and information quality. Seen together, the archive works less like a news feed and more like a reference shelf.
That distinction matters for search as well. Readers often arrive on one page through a very narrow query, then need a more complete map once they are here. The grouped archive makes that second step easier.
How the summaries are meant to help
Each summary is written to answer a simple question: what does this page help the reader understand better than a headline would? The archive is not trying to replace every source on the topic. It is trying to make the main distinctions easier to find and easier to connect.
That makes the index page useful even for repeat visitors. Once you know the categories, you can return here to decide which deeper article best matches the question you are working through next.
That is also why the summaries stay descriptive instead of sensational. The job of the index is to orient readers, not to overpromise what any one page can deliver.